Julian Assange Has Been Vindicated By The Council of Europe

Watch the live-streamed session here.

In a vote of 88 votes in favour, 13 against and 20 abstentions, the Council of Europe today voted to adopt the Resolution based on the report “The detention and conviction of Julian Assange and their chilling effects on human rights” by rapporteur Ms Thórhildur Sunna Ævarsdóttir. They confirmed that Julian Assange has been held as a political prisoner. The Council further supported Assange with strong statements objecting to how he was mistreated and why it was wrong for journalism and freedom of speech as a whole.

The debate occurred today Oct 2, 2024, and the vote to adopt the Resolution based on Sunna’s report on “The detention and conviction of Julian Assange and their chilling effects on human rights” Read Sunna’s report here. There was commentary by members concerning the transnational overreach of the US and the chilling effects it has had on journalism while an innocent man, Julian Assange has been targeted and tortured for publishing the truth in a disproportionately harsh way.

The Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly voted to confirm that Julian Assange was held as a political prisoner.

This Xthread by WikiLeaks summarizes everything.

Some comments from members of the Council.

“The watchdog role of the press guarantees that democracy underpinned by the rule of law operates effectively. This role of the press is particularly important in the light of the brutality of current armed conflicts and the growing number and growing seriousness of acts of transnational repression. If public institutions are not able to respond effectively and appropriately to abuse, the role of the press and of whistleblowers becomes crucial. WikiLeaks publications, for example, have confirmed the existence of secret prisons as well as secret and illegal kidnapping and transfers of prisoners carried out by the United States on European territory” – Ms Anna-Kristiina Mikkonen, Finland #Assange

“This must be a wakeup call, the Assange case must truly be a wakeup call for the future in the face of the suppression of political freedoms for European citizens… The unfair treatment of Julian Assange is shocking. This is an obstacle to the defence of human rights and especially media freedom and freedom of information”” – Mr Constantinos Efstathiou, Cyprus

“Julian Assange was instrumentalised in order to create a climate of fear, creating a chilling effect on the media to silence them. The harsh and disproportionate treatment of Julian Assange reveals how dysfunctional our democratic institutions are and the practices of some governments which are unacceptable especially when their interests are threatened by the revelation of the truth. Revealing the truth should not be prosecuted on the pretext of national security. On the contrary, we must protect such whistleblowing of secret information. First of all through self-regulation and according to the principle of responsibility and transparency. In Assange’s case, all of this has been instrumentalised for repressive purposes against the principles of the rule of law” – Mr Constantinos Efstathiou, Cyprus

“Today, similar laws to the [US] Espionage Act are being prepared in many countries. These laws target journalists, but also civil society activism, freedom of association and even diplomatic activity. Public rumours of this type of law have a chilling effect. I know associations in Turkey that have stopped their activities because of this.” – Ms Gökçe Gökçen, Türkiye #Assange

“It’s essential that we ensure that journalists be in a position to disseminate news and information while protecting their sources and their readers. That’s very important if the world is to remain informed” – Mr Christophe Brico, Monaco #Assange

“This [Assange] case tests our collective commitment to human rights and press freedom. If we tolerate the persecution of those who reveal the truth we undermine the very foundations of pluralistic democratic society. The core values of our organisation oblige us to stand firmly in defence of justice, transparency, the rule of law and human rights” – Vladimir Vardanyan, National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia

“It’s our job to ensure that people who want to divulge what is going on have our support. The deterrence value of Julian Assange having spent all of those years in solitary confinement is enormous. So it is essential that we do our best to guarantee the space so that whistleblowers and journalists can divulge information of this type” – Ms Petra Bayr, Austria

“Freedom of expression and press freedom are two of the foundations of the free society… What I do regret is that [Julian Assange’s] release wasn’t underpinned by a legal verdict. I think it would have been very important to have some kind of legal ruling which would have provided greater legal certainty to people who dare denounce illegal action. Without a ruling from either the UK courts or the European Court of Human Rights, this does leave something of a void. Which means that there’s justified fear that such goings on can continue and that journalists won’t necessarily benefit from protection” – Ms Petra Bayr, Austria

“I would also like to thank Julian Assange, not only for the courage he has shown over the years, but also for the fact that just three months after his release he has found his way to us here in the Council of Europe and its Parliamentary Assembly. I think that underlines the importance of the work the Council has been doing when it comes to defending press freedom when it is under threat” – Ms Petra Bayr, Austria

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This is an historic event because Julian Assange is widely considered the greatest journalist of our time and we all share the fight to speak and publish the truth freely. This is a worldwide concern and we must support journalists to be watchdogs for governments and politicians to keep them honest. We as a worldwide community need journalists to feel safe to do their jobs and not be intimidated into self-censoring due to the chilling effect that has occurred due to the Assange Case. We have to stand up as a people to support journalists who are willing to do investigative journalism and publish the truth along with evidence of the facts of the story. This is an important moment in history and we must stand for what is right.

“And please let us reject in the strongest terms, this attempt to deny that Julian’s incarceration and torture were not politically motivated. The dogs in the streets know that Julian’s case is all about politics.”

-Senator Paul Gavan of Ireland

This interview with Stella Assange: https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2024/10/04/stella-assange-in-strasbourg-so-that-a-new-assange-case-wont-happen-again/7717843/

“What’s next? Well, I think what’s next is really that we focus on Julian’s recovery and on getting used to being free again. That is our priority. I think Julian is trying to catch up with the world.” -Stella Assange

Love to all who worked so hard to see Julian Assange free and the truth upheld. <3

Assange Will Speak

Since his homecoming in June, Julian Assange has been resting healing and recovering in Australia with his family.
Julian Assange’s Homecoming was amazing and heartwarming. (June 2024)
Julian Assange and his family spending time on the beach in Australia.
Julian Assange and his father John Shipton spending time in Melbourne

We are finding out just how important those who are willing to stand up, as voices for the people, really are. Extraordinary individuals who are willing to act for securing our free speech rights, are heroes. After his release from prison in June of this year, Julian Assange will speak publicly for the very first time at the Council of Europe’s JUR Committee to testify about his experience following his confirmation as a political prisoner. PACE’s Rapporteur made a report on the wide-reaching implications of his case and what it means for freedoms and human rights. He is still recuperating, but is making this important exception to give his testimony. What will Julian say to the world, now that he can speak?

See Press Releases here and here.

What: Assange will address Council of Europe following confirmation of his status as a Political Prisoner, his first time speaking in public since becoming free.

Where:  at the Palace of Europe in Strasbourg, France to give evidence before the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE)

When:  8:30am to 10am CEST on October 1st, 2024 (Grand-Est)

How: Live steam on PACE’s YT channel Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mq85IZMeigc

“The hearing marks Assange’s first official testimony on his case since before his imprisonment in 2019. His appearance before Europe’s foremost human rights and treaty-setting body emphasizes the broader implications of his case.”

PACE Announcement: https://pace.coe.int/en/news/9600/julian-assange-to-attend-a-pace-hearing-in-strasbourg-on-his-detention-and-conviction-and-their-chilling-effect-on-human-rights

Julian Assange is widely considered the greatest journalist of our time and the fight to free him for speaking and publishing the truth was one of the most important fights for the freedom of humanity. Fighting for the right to speak and publish truth without the oppression of censorship has been one of humanity’s greatest shining moments. Julian Assange speaking publicly again is an historic moment for humanity. This has far-reaching implications. Don’t miss it.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Live Panel Discussion following Julian’s speech: Rights Dissent and Assange Defense will host a panel to discuss Julian Assange’s PACE hearing on Tuesday October 1, featuring Chip Gibbons, Marjorie Cohn, Kevin Gosztola, and Matthew PHoh

Council of Europe announcement/article: https://pace.coe.int/en/news/9578/committee-expresses-deep-concern-at-harsh-treatment-of-julian-assange-warns-of-its-chilling-effect-for-the-press

Stella Assange’s X Account

Article by Kevin Gosztola: https://thedissenter.org/assange-testify-political-imprisonment/

Consortium News article- Assange to Testify at the Council of Europe: https://consortiumnews.com/2024/09/24/assange-to-testify-at-council-of-europe/

UK Standard article: https://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/julian-assange-wikileaks-strasbourg-council-of-europe-belmarsh-prison-b1183968.html

FOIA Document Case: This article serves as a reminder of the destruction of email evidence showing that Julian Assange was targeted and set up by CPS, Sweden and the US to be trapped in a UK prison.

UK using terrorism law to silence journalists

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Stefania Maurizi is calling out the Italian government for stomping on Italian’s fundamental rights to use noble and ancient protest techniques to secure their freedom of speech.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Please Remember Journalists and whistleblowers being persecuted for speaking the truth: Dan Duggan, Josh Schulte, David McBride and others. Please stand up and speak out for them.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

WIKILEAKS PRESS RELEASE: 

Julian Assange to Address Council of Europe Following Confirmation of his Status as a Political Prisoner

On October 1, Julian Assange will arrive in Strasbourg to give evidence before the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) which is scheduled to meet from 8.30am to 10am at the Palace of Europe.

This comes following the release of the PACE inquiry report into the Assange case, authored by Rapporteur Thórhildur Sunna Ævarsdóttir. The report focuses on the implications of his detention and its broader effects on human rights, in particular freedom of journalism. The report confirms that Assange qualifies as a political prisoner and calls on the UK conduct an independent review into whether he was exposed to inhuman or degrading treatment.

Sunna Ævarsdóttir serves as the General Rapporteur for Political Prisoners and is the Chair of the Sub-Committee on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights within PACE’s Legal Affairs Committee.  She emphasises how Assange’s case is a high profile example of transnational repression. The report discusses how governments employ both legal and extralegal measures to suppress dissent across borders, which poses significant threats to press freedom and human rights.

Julian Assange is still in recovery following his release from prison in June 2024. He is attending this session in person due to the exceptional nature of the invitation and to embrace the support received from PACE and its delegates over the past years. PACE has a mandate to safeguard human rights and has repeatedly called for Julian Assange’s release when he was in prison.

He will give testimony before the committee, which will also hear the findings that his imprisonment was politically motivated.

The hearing marks Assange’s first official testimony on his case since before his imprisonment in 2019. His appearance before Europe’s foremost human rights and treaty-setting body emphasizes the broader implications of his case.

###

Julian Assange Return Home Livestream

Watch Live Now

Accompanying Julian on the plane to Australia are his lawyers Jen Robinson and Barry Pollack and two London Ambassador to Australia and Washington DC Ambassador to Australia.

Link to written Transcript of Julian Assange’s Plea Deal Hearing: https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/julian-assange-freed-live-updates-wikileaks-founder-set-to-return-to-australia-ahead-of-us-plea-deal-20240625-p5joqy.html

Press Conference just after Assange’s Plea Deal Accepted by the US judge.

Touchdown!

Julian Hugging his Wife and Father on Australian Soil

Will The Scales of Justice Tip in Assange’s Favor?

The date for the two-day Appeal Hearing for Julian Assange has been set for July 9 and 10, 2024.

Supporters are asked to attend outside the courthouse for these two days at The Royal Courts of Justice, on The Strand, London. WC2A 2LL, 8:30am, July 9 and 10, 2024. Let’s show the UK and the US that we are not going to allow Julian Assange’s human rights to continue to be diminished. Our free speech and the ability for our press around the world to function in an effective way are on the line.

Justices Jeremy Johnson and Victoria Sharp will again be presiding over Assange’s case during this hearing. Assange has been granted the right to appeal on two of nine requested grounds. First, that his extradition was in line with his free speech rights enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights, and secondly that he might be prejudiced against because of his nationality, meaning he is not being given his First Amendment protections because he is not an American.

Stella Assange’s latest Substack on The Fight to Save Her Husband: https://stellaassangeofficial.substack.com/p/we-have-a-new-hearing-date?r=1dphgx&triedRedirect=true

“He lost his liberty on the 20th of December, 2010, and that was exactly a week after WikiLeaks started publishing Cablegate. He was initially in prison for 10 days, then under house arrest, then in the Embassy for almost 7 years, and now he’s been in a high security prison for over 5 years. As time goes by, the embassy seemed like an eternity but the time that he’s spent in this high security prison, Belmarsh, is almost as long as he was in the embassy.”

The political support we seen has come from the grass roots. In Australia we’ve seen this translate into political action, so the Australian government for example up until this current administration was basically facilitating Julian’s persecution. But it was through this grass roots movement that this turned around and the current Prime Minister Albanese when he was running for the Labor Party, his platform was to find a solution to bring Julian home, and then once he was elected, he’s kept with that message. That’s come because it was politically feasible for him to do so, and that only comes from this bottom-up [grass-roots effort.] (Interview continues at link)

Assange Lawyer Jen Robinson on the Important Political Status and Implications of the Assange Case

An important summation on the status of the Assange Case by lawyer Jen Robinson concerning what American Presidential candidates have said and done, and how the Australian government is responding. Jen Robinson posts, “It is time to #FreeAssange. The Australian Prime Minister @AlboMP, government & people want this done The prosecution is risking First Amendment protections for all journalists – in the US & elsewhere. Time to end it.”

Assange Lawyer Jen Robinson on the Important Political Status and Implications of the Assange Case

The International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI) urges President Biden to drop all charges against Julian Assange

“We urge the Court to uphold the fundamental right to free expression and protect the indispensable role of a free, independent media as the watchdogs of democratic societies.” – Baroness Kennedy on Julian Assange s upcoming hearing in the UK Courts. Human Rights Lawyers are United.

https://www.ibanet.org/IBAHRI-urges-US-President-Joe-Biden-to-drop-all-charges-against-Julian-Assange

https://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/politics/39864-biden-must-drop-charges-against-assange-says-iba

This is a moving, passionate statement from French mathematician Cédric Villani just after visiting Julian Assange in Belmarsh prison. Listen to his message:

Cities For Assange

Noam Chomsky’s Witness Statement Read into the Record at Previous Assange Hearing

On the 30th of Sept 2020 a witness statement from Noam Chomsky (dated 12 Feb 2020) was read into the record of the UK hearing of a US extradition request for Julian Assange. The judge would not permit the witness to take the stand and speak for himself, ostensibly to “save time”. This is a reading of Noam Chomsky’s written statement. It begins by stating his long working history in academia, and his even longer list of honorary degrees, memberships and prizes. Then follows an extensive list of Professor Chomsky’s published works. By way of preamble, Professor Chomsky says: “I have been asked whether Julian Assange’s work and actions can be considered as “political”, a question I am informed is of significance to the extradition request by the United States for Mr. Assange to be tried for espionage for having played a part on the publication of information that the United States government did not wish to be publicly known…”

Article by Noam Chomsky in Declassified.

Things could have gone a different way if Jeremy Corbyn hadn’t been destroyed by a vicious media campaign. But today’s British authorities just take the orders – and Julian Assange is one of the victims.

Independent Parliamentary Candidate Craig Murray Addressed the UN Human Rights Committee in Geneva in March of This Year Regarding the Rights and Freedoms of Julian Assange.

A Few Words for Members of The Press

Assange supporters number in the millions worldwide. They are professionals, Moms and Dads, individuals, large professional organizations, intelligent, caring, resourceful and determined. All eyes are on the the press right now as to how they are going to report about Julian Assange. Is the media going to repeat the same misinformation and mischaracterizations, as it has in the past, or are members of the media going to do the right thing and stand up for Julian Assange and the future of free speech and journalism? The political stakes are getting higher every day as the public calls for their politicians to end the imprisonment of Julian Assange. The public outcry all over the world gets more numerous and louder in volume by the moment.

What side are you going to stand on this time?

What have we learned?

Are we going to join our voices and demand the freedom we all know Assange should have?

MayDay for Julian Assange

MayDay. The world needs a hero right now. People are urgently standing up for their rights and freedoms, asserting their rights and using their voices. Despite the Biden Administration saying “journalism is not a crime,” the fate of our most award winning journalist in the world is in America’s hands, and America is not responding to the millions of voices and letters, emails and phone calls received daily clammoring for Julian Assange’s release from detention in a UK maximum security prison.

MayDay. If Julian Assange is successfully convicted, then any journalist in the world could be arrested for similar reasons using the Espionage Act, for printing anything the U.S. claims to be state secrets. It will become a new customary practice for the U.S. to impose its laws on anyone in the world, regardless of whether that person has ever been in the United States or not.

On May 20, 2024, people are gathering outside the Royal Courts of Justice on The Strand at 8 am London time, to hear the UK High Court’s decision whether to accept the (non) assurances given by the United States and extradite him immediately, to allow him to appeal, or to release him. The UK High Court asked the United States Department of Justice for assurances that Mr. Assange would have the protection of the First Amendment, would not be discriminated against due to his nationality and would not be given the death penalty. The response issued by the United States was that “a sentence of death will neither be sought nor imposed on Assange,” assuring that he will not be “tried for a death-eligible offense” and that Mr. Assange, an Australian citizen, can “raise and seek” a defense under the First Amendment, but cautioned that “a decision as to the applicability of the First Amendment is exclusively within the purview of the U.S. Courts.” (1)

The U.S. is not willing to assure Assange and his family of his free speech rights, but is instead saying that he is welcome to try to get protection from a U.S. court. Assange has already spent 5 years in detainment while an endless legal back and forth continues between the U.S. and the UK. Assange’s wife Stella responded with a statement,“The U.S. has limited itself to blatant weasel words claiming that Julian can ‘seek to raise’ the first amendment if extradited,” she said. “The diplomatic note does nothing to relieve our family’s extreme distress about his future – his grim expectation of spending the rest of his life in isolation in U.S. prison for publishing award-winning journalism. The Biden administration must drop this dangerous prosecution before it is too late.”(2)  

Numerous international organizations have spoken out against the America’s stand against giving journalist Julian Assange free press and human rights protections. Julia Hall from Amnesty International says that U.S. diplomatic assurances are inherently unreliable. It promises to do something and then reserves the right to break the promise, and “The strategy is to keep Assange detained as long as possible. It’s a kind of death by a thousand cuts.”(3)

The concern is that by imposing the Espionage Act, a U.S. law, on a non-American journalist that published on foreign soil, but then unwilling to give that same journalist U.S. free press First Amendment protections, the U.S. is showing prejudice based on nationality.

Even more concerning are the implications for journalism worldwide. If the U.S. is successful in an Assange conviction, it will alter the common practices of every journalist, and there will be many more arrests until every journalist complies with only printing state approved information. “What this diplomatic note really means:” Assange’s brother, Gabriel Shipton tweets out, “Any Publisher globally is fair game. No 1st Amendment protection. Publish and Perish.”(4)

Urgent calls from journalists worldwide are being made: “We the undersigned Europeans unions and associations of journalists, join the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) in calling on the U.S. government to drop all charges against Julian Assange and allow him to return home to his wife and children. We are gravely concerned about the impact of Assange’s continued detention on media freedom and the rights of all journalists globally. We urge European governments to actively work to secure Julian Assange’s release.” Many world leaders have declared to the United States that Julian Assange should be given his freedom and that free speech must be upheld. Recently, the President of Mexico, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, called for the immediate release of Julian Assange saying that he is hopeful that this will be achieved, because it would be an act of justice of the highest level. A good demonstration to the world that freedom of expression, demonstration, and freedom of the press are respected.

With the harshest stories of Assange put out by the media, painting him as someone not worthy of the respect of upholding his human rights, thereby manipulating public opinion negating any effort to challenge U.S. prosecution of this award-winning journalist. Whether it was out of the embarrassment they suffered, or to discourage any other journalist from doing investigative reporting on their war crimes, the U.S. was not open to hearing from any of those world leaders or international organizations. While all this goes on, Julian Assange sits in a 6’ x 12’ box for 23 hours a day (5), with only some books for companionship.

In June of 2022, the mother of Julian Assange, Christine made an impassioned plea for her son’s freedom. “I respectfully make my plea directly to the parties involved… after 11 ½ years in pre-trial detention, and with legal proceedings dragging on with no end in sight, it has become clear to all following that this case is political and requires a diplomatic solution. When people become very invested in winning at all costs, the collateral damage is truth, justice and humanity. I implore all sides to take a step back from the heat of the fight for a moment, and to reflect. I ask all sides to consider a diplomatic solution. Negotiating an end to conflict is a normal part of civilized existence, within a marriage, the boardroom, long-running legal cases, and disputes within nation states. In the spirit of bringing this to an end, both sides will need to give a little. Julian has been detained long enough to satisfy any needs for revenge from those pursuing prosecution. He has suffered enough to satisfy those wishing to make him a symbol for press freedom. I beseech those who say they really care about Julian to put his needs as a suffering human-being first. And I have faith that with good will on both sides a resolution can be reached. Thank you for hearing my plea.”

What has and hasn’t been covered of this whole story in the legacy media is a crime. What gets repeated is the same initial misleading misinformation painting Julian Assange as an errant hacker helping Manning steal government secrets, but nothing could be further from the truth. That is where the public has been done such a grave disservice by lack of truthful reporting in the media. The public has missed out on learning about the Assange family’s fight for Julian’s life, out of their love for him. But more importantly, because the media is not reporting this story accurately, most of the American public is being caught off-guard and unprepared for the fight to uphold their First Amendment rights in America. The world has missed out on this story, one that is so very important to our humanity, as human beings with hearts that beat. Claim humanity and fight for the freedom of Julian Assange.

1. https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/news/united-states-provides-binding-assurances-to-the-united-kingdom-that-julian-assange-will-not-face-the-death-penalty-if-extradited

2. https://assangedefense.org/hearing-coverage/u-s-continues-its-pursuit-of-julian-assange/

3. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2021/07/the-us-diplomatic-assurances-are-inherently-unreliable-julian-assange-must-be-released/

4. https://twitter.com/GabrielShipton/status/1780705737959940164

5. https://twitter.com/Infrarot_Medien/status/1759916419112722844

5. https://twitter.com/Stella_Assange/status/1474726659806871553

What The Assange Case Means for the Integrity of Journalism

It’s hard to paint WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange as a family man, so much cloudy characterizations and intrigue have been crafted by the media for public consumption. Much of it has been very far from the truth. Is he unkind to cats? Was he a poor houseguest in the Ecuadorian Embassy? The truth is that Julian Assange is a married man with a beautiful wife dedicated to his freedom and two sons, ages five and six. Like many of us, the importance of the survival of our families has become prominent in our values. Stella describes how she helps Julian’s mental health, “Julian has been in a high security prison for almost five years. I try to keep him connected to the day to day. I try to keep him connected to the reality outside, because if it becomes too much about those prison walls, then it’s easy to get lost.”

U.S. President Joe Biden recently told reporters that the U.S. is considering Australia’s request asking to release Julian Assange from charges which have caused his detention for potential extradition to the United States for trial. This had been a contentious topic for the U.S., whenever asked, they have typically referred people to the U.S. Department of Justice. But now that it has been signaled that there are diplomatic talks going on, U.S. State Department spokesman Matthew Miller stated yesterday that “that is a good way to try to get me to comment on extradition matters, but I’m going to refrain from doing so, I would refer you to the Department of Justice.” Personally though, Spokesman Miller, tweeted from his personal Twitter account in 2019, that the allegations in the U.S. indictment against Assange was “Dangerous and probably unconstitutional. DOJ doesn’t get to decide who is deserving of first amendment protections and who isn’t. There’s a reason we wouldn’t charge this in the Obama administration.”

Being that it has become a tradition for truth to get out to the public through whistleblowers such as U.S. Army Intelligence Officer Chelsea Manning, through news publications such as The Washington Post, The New York Times and WikiLeaks, the question of Assange’s role in Manning’s information being made public has come front and center. Did Julian Assange really help Chelsea Manning crack passwords, hack into government computers or cover her tracks as the U.S. claims?

“She already had authorisation [to access the datasets].” Computer forensic expert Patrick Eller told the UK Court in 2020. Allegations that Julian Assange attempted to help former Manning crack a password and leak classified material anonymously do not fit with the evidence. He states that “Merely logging into a different local user account on the computer (such as ftp user) would not anonymise Manning at all because the IP address of the computer would remain the same regardless of what user account is in use.” “There was no evidence that Manning had attempted to download these documents anonymously and no indication that she was trying to crack the ftp user account password,” said Eller.

https://www.computerweekly.com/news/252489645/Forensic-expert-questions-US-claims-that-Assange-conspired-to-crack-military-password

The allegation that Assange tried to help Manning remain anonymous has no supporting evidence. The U.S. is trying to convict on baseless allegations. There is no evidence that Manning and Assange spoke prior to Manning uploading her whistleblower information to WikiLeaks secure site. In her book, READEME.txt: A Memoir, Manning writes: “I called switchboards at The Washington Post and The New York Times, trying to get transferred to a reporter who would understand what I was offering them. I reached one at the Post, and we talked briefly, I left a message with my Skype number at the Times, but I never heard back. I said only that I worked in Defense. I tried to get them to understand. What I have is everything about two wars, I said over the phone. This is what asymmetric warfare looks like, uncut; this is the whole thing. I wanted this information published in a widely read outlet that could defend itself. But I wasn’t getting anywhere.”

If the U.S.’s allegations are refuted by the facts of the Chelsea Manning trial, then why does the U.S.’s indictment carry any viability with the UK High Court? The UK High Court has asked the U.S. to give assurances that it will give Assange his first amendment rights, will not prejudice against him because of his nationality and will not attach the death penalty with any additional charges before it considers extraditing him. But this has gone on for 5 years with Assange being held in solitary confinement in conditions assessed by two UN Special Rapporteurs on Torture as “He continues to be detained under oppressive conditions of isolation and surveillance, not justified by his detention status.” Assange has been in ghastly conditions, definitely an overkill for someone who is not a violent criminal.

https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2019/11/un-expert-torture-sounds-alarm-again-julian-assanges-lifemay-be-risk

Is holding someone in legal limbo indefinitely without charge, a breach of process? The International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute condemns the mistreatment of Julian Assange and issued this statement: “The IBAHRI is concerned that the mistreatment of Julian Assange constitutes breaches of his right to a fair trial and protections enshrined in the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, to which the UK is party. It is deeply shocking that as a mature democracy in which the rule of law and the rights of individuals are preserved, the UK Government has been silent and has taken no action to terminate such gross and disproportionate conduct by Crown officials. As well, we are surprised that the presiding judge has reportedly said and done nothing to rebuke the officials and their superiors for such conduct in the case of an accused whose offence is not one of personal violence. Many countries in the world look to Britain as an example in such matters. On this occasion, the example is shocking and excessive. It is reminiscent of the Abu Grahib Prison Scandal which can happen when prison officials are not trained in the basic human rights of detainees and the Nelson Mandela Rules.”

https://www.ibanet.org/article/C05C57EE-1FEE-47DC-99F9-26824208A750

With no governing global ruling body exercising its authority over the United States State Department, Julian Assange seems to be entrapped in a web of endless legal entanglements, by design. With him, is the future survival of press freedoms and journalism, because if the U.S. is successful in its attempt to prosecute a foreign journalist publishing on foreign soil, then all journalists all over the world are in jeopardy of being arrested for publishing truths that the public needs to know, but governments don’t want them to know. An Assange conviction could mean that journalists everywhere only publish what governments allow them to publish. It has far-reaching ramifications for the survival of the first amendment for public and press. Meanwhile Julian Assange’s survival depends on the public to unite in one voice and call for his freedom. Stella Assange: “This just has to stop. Right now, he’s in a very precarious situation where his health is in decline and that in itself is perhaps the greatest risk.” For Assange, massive public outcry cannot come a moment too soon.

What The Assange Case Means for the Integrity of Journalism

The Julian Assange Case Should be Straightforward

One hot potato topic in the news right now is the Julian Assange case. Publisher, journalist, humanitarian and innovator Julian Assange is being held in a UK high security prison without committing a crime. Contrary to most people’s knowledge of the case, Julian has not been convicted in the case brought by the US authorities for publishing evidence of their crimes committed during the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria. They have been detaining him in a UK high security prison for almost five years. He is not serving any sentence. There is no conviction. How can an innocent man be kept in prison for almost five years and indefinitely into the future like this? What kind of justice system allows this?

Assange did something very different than the journalism we have become used to; he made the source documentation available alongside the articles he wrote. He respected the intelligence of his readers and allowed them to see for themselves and make up their own minds what they thought of the situation, promoting productive discussion. What has been happening is that the public is being pelted with narratives that trigger strong emotions and cause opposition and division, all based on the delivery of a story that may or may not have any basis in truth.

Why can’t we have journalism that publishes evidence of the story that is able to be verified by the people so the people can use their critical thinking skills? Why is showing proof of the truth such a threat to governments and to the media? Assange’s conviction could be a death sentence to Free Press reporting and investigative journalism. Why are so many journalists so silent about Julian Assange when his outcome affects their own future?

US Army Intelligence Specialist Whistleblower Chelsea (Bradley) Manning who, acting alone, took the classified files, served only seven years in prison and her sentence was commuted by President Barack Obama. Julian Assange, the publisher/journalist who published the files, as did many other news organizations, faces 175 years imprisonment and a possible death penalty.

Why is there such a discrepancy between the proposed sentence for Assange and what Chelsea Manning served? Manning broke laws with the government, her employer and her country. Assange broke no law, is a member of the free press with Free Speech protections, and isn’t even an American citizen. According to University of Chicago Distinguished Political Science Professor John Mearsheimer, “Manning broke the law by leaking material that was classified to Assange. But Assange is a journalist and he did not break the law, as it is commonplace for a journalist to publish classified information that is passed on to them by government insiders.” Professor Mearsheimer believes it is a straight-forward case and is asking the UK High Court not to extradite Assange to the United States.

But that huge life and death sentence with which Assange is being threatened? Is the U.S. applying the law fairly across the two cases? So many things in the Assange Case do not follow usual customs and established laws and precedents. One might even think that a government, not wanting to have its reckless behavior shown to the public it is sworn to protect, could possibly be using the potential life of Julian Assange to intimidate the press and the public because they don’t like being embarrassed by uncomfortable truths.

Assange’s wife Stella states: “The purpose isn’t just to put him on trial; it’s to parade him as a political prisoner essentially to show him off as ‘if you embarrass the powers that be, this is what will happen to you’ as a deterrent for other courageous journalists, publishers and whistleblowers that want to expose wrongdoing that they shouldn’t because they will be hounded.”

A Congressional Resolution to Freeing Julian Assange

The prosecution of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has come front and center in a growing number of minds of many Americans because they feel he is being unfairly persecuted and because of the implications for free speech, the First Amendment and the future of journalism. The precedent set would allow governments to cross the line of First Amendment protections of citizens and journalists anywhere in the world.

Assange’s innovations in transparency in journalism publishing verifiable evidence of the story was so novel that he was scrutinized by the U.S. government and the news media for breaking the norm of telling narratives to the public and relying on public trust for public belief in whatever they are told. Things came to a head when WikiLeaks published a trove of evidence of the CIA’s secret practices of spying on the Americans through their smart devices. This embarrassed then Secretary Mike Pompeo so badly that he held a press conference and labeled WikiLeaks a “non-state hostile intelligence service” and went to work plotting the destruction of WikiLeaks and Assange, whether it was legal or not.

Assange was first charged under the Trump Administration with one count under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) for allegedly helping U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning access Defense Department computers without authorization. When in fact, it was established at Manning’s trial that she already had her own full security access and needed no further assistance. 17 charges under the Espionage Act were then added. No other publisher had ever been prosecuted under the Espionage Act prior to those 17 charges. Mr. Assange could face up to 175 years behind bars, effectively a death sentence, for these charges and it was admitted by the U.S. prosecution that it cannot rule out the death penalty. The Biden Administration has not shown any interest in resolving the situation.

Last November, Representative Thomas Massie, Representative Jim McGovern and Senator Rand Paul introduced a bi-partisan letter to President Biden urging him to drop the prosecution of Julian Assange. The 16 signatory are James P. McGovern, Thomas Massie, Rashida Tlaib, Eric Burlison, Ilhan Omar, Paul A. Gosar, Ayanna Pressle, Marjorie Tayler Greene, Pramila Jayapal, Matthew Rosendale, Greg Casar, Cori Bush, Jamaal Bowman, Jesús G. “Chuy” Garcia, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rand Paul.

The letter states: “We believe the Department of Justice acted correctly in 2013, during your vice-presidency, when it declined to pursue charges against Mr. Assange for publishing the classified documents because it recognized that the prosecution would set a dangerous precedent. We note that the 1917 Espionage Act was ostensibly intended to punish and imprison government employees and contractors for providing or selling state secrets to enemy governments, not to punish journalists and whistleblowers for attempting to inform the public about serious issues that some U.S. government officials might prefer to keep secret.” The letter further states: “It is the duty of journalists to seek out sources, including documentary evidence, in order to report to the public on the activities of government. The United States must not pursue an unnecessary prosecution that risks criminalizing common journalistic practices and thus chilling the work of the free press. We urge you to ensure that this case be brought to a close in as timely a manner as possible.”

House Resolution 934 sponsored by Paul Gosar, was introduced on 12/13/2023 and expresses the sense that regular journalistic activities are protected under the First Amendment, and that the United States ought to drop all charges against and attempts to extradite Julian Assange. Co-sponsors on this important Resolution are James P. McGovern, Thomas Massie, Marjorie Tayler Greene, Anna Paulina Luna, Eric Burlson, Jeff Duncan, Ilhan Omar, Clay Higgins, Rashida Tlaib and Cori Bush.

With ten co-sponsors, the resolution needs 10 more to go for a vote. Americans can contact their Representatives at 202-224-3121 (House Switchboard) and ask them to co-sponsor and vote. This is the democratic system at work with the people communicating with their Representatives, and those Representatives gathering to vote and make the proper changes reflecting the voice of the people. It is up to the people to utilize that system and make their voices heard and have a better chance of being heard in an election year. Assange’s case is paramount to the future survival of free speech and upholding the First Amendment. We cannot have any healthy debate or be informed about our governments if the U.S. is attempting to arrest journalists because it doesn’t like what they are publishing, whether they are American citizens or not.

Assange’s wife Stella states: “What’s being done to Julian is by design – it’s there to intimidate. To intimidate regular citizens but also to intimidate journalists, people who are in the profession. It’s there to give an example of authoritarian abuse to the world”

Assange Hearing Recap: Day1

This is a running live update from a friend on the hearing for Julian Assange’s freedom in the UK High Court today, February 20, 2024. The hearing continues tomorrow. The freedom for all of us to publish our thoughts and feelings hangs in the balance. After that, the judges will deliberate likely for several weeks. *there is no mandatory frame of time, the estimate for a ruling is based on previous time-frames judges have taken in this case. The ruling could also be immediate.* If he is extradited to the US, and convicted which would most certainly happen if he is sent there, all of journalism, free speech, the free press and all of us bloggers will be fair game because of the precedent established. We must fight for Assange’s freedom because his freedom, is ours.

Assange Trial Day 1 live:

Assange’s lawyers have argued today that the CIA plotted to kill Julian Assange, and that he cannot be safely extradited to a country that planned his kidnapping/ assassination.

Fresh evidence shows options were presented directly to President Trump over killing Assange after Vault-7 leaks.

(Defense for Assange is establishing that entire US government was/is hostile to Assange and cannot therefore guarantee a safe trial. They are appealing the scope of previous findings ruled on by the court)

Defense has raised point that document U.S. is relying on for extradition contains clause forbidding extradition of political prisoners. Argues U.S. cannot simultaneously want to extradite because of political embarrassment while ignoring that section of the treaty.

Also raised was fact that Wikileaks was not the first or only outlet to receive said classified documents from Manning, but the prosecution has been selective (targeting Assange) with no explanation for this behavior.
(note*** for posterity. This is not entirely correct as the charges actually revolve around an unidentified WikiLeaks representative offering to help Manning obtain more* But* there is no way for positive identification of Assange possible as that representative, so it is a nonsequitor, legally speaking. Also, no such assistance took place.)

Assange trial live: Court breaks for lunch, will resume 2pm London time.

Defense is raising an Article 7 ECHR/ 5th Amendment argument, stating that multiple forms of classified material have been published and gone unprosecuted, stating there is no precedent in U.S. law for the prosecution of journalists.
They are arguing that the previous judge refused to engage that line of legal argument stating it should be resolved in U.S. courts because it is a 5th amendment issue (due process).
Defense argues that because Article 7 of the ECHR applies, the judge should have had to engage it and acknowledge its legal standing.
(defense for Assange is once more appealing the previous court actions and errors here).

Section 7 of the ECHR protects someone from being prosecuted for future crime. In other words retroactively making something illegal in order to prosecute them.

Sec 7 of ECHR: “No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offense under national or international law at the time when it was committed.”

Defense now raises article 10 of the ECHR saying that Manning’s actions in leaking information fall under the protection of freedom of speech and expression.

Article 10 of the ECHR protects whistleblowers if documents are authentic and it is well within the public interest to know.
It protects both their right to receive and send such information; including in cases of classified documents if, like in Manning’s case; said documents were improperly classified to cover up war crimes.

This pertains to the charge against Julian for allegedly (again, unprovable) offering to help Manning procure the documents if needed.

If in fact the documents were improperly classified and covering up war crimes (they were); then Manning as a whistleblower falls under that protection of the ECHR and by extension, the journalist helping break that story in public interest.

This is weighty legally because according to multiple reviews, no one was directly harmed by the release of said information.

Defense raises point about Assistant US District Attorney Gordon Kromberg claiming they could and would deny Assange first amendment rights.

Judge ask for clarification about previous judges saying there is no reason to suspect Assange’s first amendment rights would be infringed.
Defense explains that Both the assistant DA and the then-CIA head Pompeo both said that explicitly. Claiming that Assange had no rights in the U.S. This threat alone raises serious concerns about any guarantees made toward Assange’s safety or right to a fair trial.

Judge then asks if the U.S. actually gave the court any assurances as to Assange’s first amendment rights being protected or the rights of foreign nationals.

Defense replies that no such assurances have been made whatsoever.

Final ground of appeal is put forward by defense.

Given the designation by the CIA head that Wikileaks was a “hostile non state intelligence agency” giving the bureau authority to act without oversight of any kind, there are absolute threats to Assange’s life present in the case under articles 2 & 3 of the ECHR (Right to Life, and Freedom from Torture).

Defense argues that CIA could impose SAMS (Special Administrative Measures – can prevent lawyer access, bar all outside communication or contact for life) or if they wanted to; kill him with absolute legal impunity based on this designation.

Defense requests extradition order be rescinded based on its inconsistency with standing treaty.

House Resolution 934 to Free Assange

H.Res. 934: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that regular journalistic activities are protected under the First Amendment, and that the United States ought to drop all charges against and attempts to extradite Julian Assange.

Please contact your US Congressman and ask them to sign onto House Resolution 934 to retract the charges and extradition request for Julian Assange and to protect journalism under the First Amendment.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-resolution/934/cosponsors?s=1&r=1&q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22julian+assange%22%7D

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/118/hres934

With Hearing Set, Time For Biden to Drop Assange Charges