Free
How Julian Assange Spent His 53rd Birthday
Tag: #FreeAssange
How Julian Assange Shocked the Media
Discrepancies in facts create disagreements which can lead to wars. The famous quote by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange applies here: “If wars can be started by lies, then peace can be started with truth.” Following the release of the famous Collateral Murder video of 14 years ago, showing U.S. forces gunning down civilians in Iraq, the fact is that drone and helicopter strikes ceased, and the war in Iraq soon ended. Julian Assange has been painted by the media as endangering lives, when in fact the opposite is true.
What Assange did was so new, publishing verifiable documented evidence of what is really going on, that it seemed a radical departure to the traditional narratives and stories told by news outlets relying on public trust and belief in what they are being told. Politicians and the media reported that Assange put lives at risk by publishing source documentation such as war logs and diplomatic cables from whistleblower Chelsea Manning, but the United States admitted in court that there have been no cases where someone has been harmed by WikiLeaks publication of Manning’s disclosures. Witnesses attest that Assange did redact all harmful information and in fact was criticized for over-redacting. Reportedly, anything that was not redacted was already publicly published through other sites such as cryptome.org.
Assange’s innovations in journalism opened up a whole new practice of public awareness and scrutiny using discernment and critical thinking skills. The public began to look for evidential proof of the stories they were being told, and many of them didn’t mind doing the research for themselves. Julian Assange revolutionized journalism by making the source documentation available to the public alongside articles he wrote and lectures he gave. He showed the proof and let the public look it over and see the truth for themselves. When the truth is clear because the facts are made available for all to see, transparency ends disagreements and promotes cooperation between groups and nations.
Assange is a humanitarian and he innovated more ways to solve problems and promote peace. He created a safe and secure way for whistleblowers to upload files because when governments behave recklessly, it has become a tradition for whistleblowers to come forward and disclose information to the public that might cause a government embarrassment. But transparency can lead to a government that operates with integrity and accountability. We cannot continue forward in any healthy or productive manner if a government is censoring the free speech of the public and arresting members of the free press.
What Assange did for the world was provide a way for the public to be sure of the truth, on the basis that a public has a right to know how their government is behaving on their behalf, and public knowledge of knowing what the facts are is part of that. The only benefit to selling narratives and confusing the facts is to keep wars going endlessly so more money can be made from the sale of weapons and the extraction of more taxpayer money.
Unfortunately, the U.S. government hasn’t been able to overcome its embarrassment over the exposure of their conduct in war zones, and opted to criminalize Assange’s work. In a recent interview with Pat Kenny, Assange’s wife Stella explains, “The whole indictment is a set up because he is being accused of doing what journalists do every day, receiving information from Chelsea Manning, processing it, and making it public, and that is described as a criminal conspiracy and criminal act.”
Julian Assange’s Roman Citizenship
The two-day hearing in the UK High Court for Australian journalist Julian Assange’s last appeal was on February 20 and 21, 2024. Following the hearing, the two judges presiding asked for additional information and additional time. Their decision could come any moment. What hangs in the balance is Assange’s chances to appeal through the UK High Court, or he could be put on a plane headed for the Eastern District of Virginia Federal Court in the United States. If this chance is turned down, there is a possibility of applying to the European Court of Human Rights to ask for an emergency injunction to prevent the UK from extraditing him. But it is up to the ECHR to intervene.
Assange did not attend his hearing for health reasons. He is being held in the UK’s harshest prison for murderers and other convicted felons, and the prison conditions have contributed to the decline of his delicate health. He also suffered a mini-stroke last year. He’s not been formally charged, and is only being held on remand for a potential extradition to the U.S. to face a total of 18 accusations based on an old U.S. law from 1917 called the Espionage Act.
On the first day of the hearing, the defense made a point to clarify that U.S. Army Intelligence Analyst C.E. Manning is a whistleblower/leaker, and Assange/WikiLeaks is the journalist/publisher. The whistleblower had been an employee of the U.S. military and has already been punished for breaking confidentiality. As a member of the press and a non U.S. citizen, Julian Assange had no such confidentiality agreement with the U.S. government. The accusations in the U.S. indictment suggest Assange assisted Manning to crack a password, but Manning clearly already had access and clearance through her work, and no hacking was needed. Manning was on leave when she initially spoke and gave documents to more than one news organization before securely uploading to WikiLeaks’ site. She did not speak to Julian Assange until well beyond the transfer of information.
One misstatement often repeated is that people were harmed by what WikiLeaks published, but at C.E. Manning’s trial, the U.S. admitted that in actuality no one was harmed. They could not think of a single incident. Accusations that Assange did not redact names are not true. Several witnesses were present when Assange redacted thousands of names. Redactions were not made in the diplomatic cables because those cables were already out in the public venue published in their entirety on Cryptome.org.
Defense also brought out that the head of the CIA at the time, Mike Pompeo allegedly planned the kidnapping and murder of Julian Assange. Pompeo, then threatened the over thirty witnesses implicating him as chief architect in a CIA conspiracy to commit murder. The defense made the point that extraditing Assange to the U.S. would be putting him in the hands of the same people who plotted his assassination. It was also mentioned that the CIA illegally spied on Assange through a Spanish security company called UC Global, and learning his legal defense strategy while he was in asylum in the Ecuadorian Embassy. A separate, ongoing case has been brought against the CIA by Assange’s lawyers over the violation of privacy.
The importance of this case is what it means to the future of journalism, free speech and press freedoms. If Julian Assange is extradited to the United States and successfully convicted, then the Espionage Act, that has never been used against a journalist before, could then be used to arrest any journalist in the world whom the US state department deems indictable for publishing classified material, whether it is in the public interest or not. It could also affect whether the First Amendment will protect the Free Speech of the Free Press, or not. The future jobs of journalists may be in jeopardy and many Assange supporters feel their right to know the truth will be at risk.
Assange has garnered support from major human rights groups and has won dozens of journalism awards. His release is advocated by two UN Special Rapporteurs on Torture and one UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression. Articles have been written and speeches have been made substantiating that his work as a publisher and journalist falls within free speech protections due to its relevancy to the public’s right to know. There is a healthy support system of dedicated grass-roots activists numbering in the millions worldwide coming from a wide variety of backgrounds such as doctors, law professors, teachers, students independent journalists and free speech supporters. Support for Assange comes from the political left, right and center. Several members of U.S. Congress wrote a bi-partisan letter last year calling on President Biden and Attorney General Merrick Garland to end Assange’s prosecution. Currently in the works is House Resolution 934 to protect journalism as free speech and release Assange home to his family. Lawmakers and parliamentarians in several countries have grown in number and increased the volume in calling for an end to Assange’s persecution and for him to finally be given his freedom.
Stella Assange, wife of Julian, has been leading the heroic battle for her husband’s freedom. She is afraid he would not survive extradition in his fragile health, leaving their two sons fatherless. Doctors and two UN Rapporteurs on Torture agree, leaving their two young sons fatherless. Assange’s brother, Gabriel Shipton, who attended the 2024 State of the Union Address as a guest of Congressman Thomas Massie, expressed the widely-shared concern that Julian Assange, whose health is delicate, will not survive the extradition to the United States. It was admitted by prosecutors at Assange’s hearing that there is no assurance that the Eastern District of Virginia Federal Court would not add the death penalty to the 175 years being held over his head.
Assange was made an honorary citizen of Rome last month. The term Civis Romanus Sum (I am a Roman citizen) historically constitutes a plea for the legal human rights of a Roman Citizen. In 1850 Lord Palmerston thought that the rights of CIVIS ROMANUS extended to British subjects, which includes citizens of commonwealth countries like Australia. A court in the UK may well have precedent to set Julian Assange free. Lord Palmerston said in his famous speech “Civis Romanus Sum so also a British subject, in whatever land he may be, shall feel confident that the watchful eye and the strong arm of England, will protect him against injustice and wrong.”
The Tremendous Effort to Save Julian Assange’s Life
PRESS RELEASE
March 8, 2024
For Immediate Release
THE TREMENDOUS EFFORT TO SAVE THE LIFE OF JULIAN ASSANGE
The two-day hearing in the UK High Court for Australian journalist Julian Assange’s last appeal was on February 20 and 21, 2024. The two judges presiding asked for additional information and additional time. Their decision could come any moment. Assange did not attend for health reasons. The decision is to allow further appeal through the European Court of Human Rights, or extradite him to the United States.
It is important to note that Assange has not been formally charged, and is only being held on remand to a potential extradition to the U.S. to face the accusations in the U.S. indictment, a total of 18 charges amounting to 175 years in prison on an old U.S. law called the Espionage Act. On the first day, the defense made a point to clarify that Chelsea Manning is a whistleblower/leaker, and Julian Assange/WikiLeaks the journalist/publisher. The whistleblower had been an service member of the U.S. military and has already been punished for breaking confidentiality. As a member of the press and a non U.S. citizen, Julian Assange had no confidentiality agreement with the U.S. government. The accusations in the U.S. indictment suggest Julian Assange assisted Manning to crack a password, but Manning clearly already had access and clearance through her work, so no hacking was needed. C.E. Manning was on leave when she initially spoke and gave documents to more than one news organization before uploading to WikiLeaks secure upload. She did not speak to Julian Assange until well beyond the transfer of information.
The misstatement was made that people were harmed by what WikiLeaks published, but at C.E. Manning’s trial, U.S. admitted in actuality that no one was harmed. Accusations that Assange did not redact names are not true. Several witnesses were present when Assange redacted thousands of names. Redactions were not made in the diplomatic cables, because they were already out in the public venue published in their entirety on Cryptome.org.
The defense also brought out that the head of the CIA, Mike Pompeo planned the kidnapping and murder of Julian Assange. The defense made the point that extraditing Assange to the U.S. would be putting him in the hands of the same people who plotted his murder. It was also mentioned that the CIA illegally spied on Assange, through a company called UC Global, learning his legal defense strategy while he was in the Ecuadorian Embassy.
The importance of this case is what it means to the future of journalism, free speech and press freedoms. If Julian Assange is extradited to the U.S. and successfully convicted, then the Espionage Act, a U.S. law that has never been used against a journalist before, could then be used to arrest any journalist in the world whom the U.S. state department deems has printed classified material, whether it is in the public interest, or not. It could also affect whether the First Amendment will protect the Free Speech of the Free Press, or not. The future jobs of journalists may be in jeopardy and many Assange supporters feel their right to know the truth will be at risk.
Stella Assange, wife of Julian, has been leading the heroic battle for her husband’s freedom. She is afraid he would not survive extradition in his fragile health, and doctors and two UN Rapporteurs on Torture agree. In addition, Assange’s brother, Gabriel Shipton who attended the 2024 State of the Union Address as a guest of Congressman Thomas Massie, expressed the wide concern that Julian Assange who’s health is delicate would not survive the extradition to the United States. Finally, it was admitted by prosecutors at Assange’s hearing that there is no assurance that the Eastern District of Virginia Court would not add the death penalty to the 175 years being held over his head.
###
You must be logged in to post a comment.